1 | define([ |
---|
2 | "dojo/_base/lang", // dojo.getObject |
---|
3 | "dojo/_base/window", // dojo.doc |
---|
4 | "dojo/_base/sniff", // dojo.isIE |
---|
5 | "dojo/query", |
---|
6 | "dojo/parser", |
---|
7 | "dojox/xml/parser" |
---|
8 | ], function(dojo, window, has, query, parser, dxparser){ |
---|
9 | |
---|
10 | var dXml = lang.getObject("dojox.xml", true); |
---|
11 | |
---|
12 | /** |
---|
13 | Take some sort of xml block |
---|
14 | * like <dojo.button caption="blah"/> and turn |
---|
15 | * it into a widget.. |
---|
16 | */ |
---|
17 | |
---|
18 | /** |
---|
19 | * We want to support something like: |
---|
20 | * <body> |
---|
21 | * <script> |
---|
22 | * <dijit.layout.SplitContainer> |
---|
23 | * <dijit.button/> |
---|
24 | * <div>...</div> |
---|
25 | * </dijit.layout.SplitContainer> |
---|
26 | * </body> |
---|
27 | * |
---|
28 | * This is very tricky because if we parse this as XML then the <div> tag |
---|
29 | * is actually an XML tag, not an XML tag, which is problematic in at least |
---|
30 | * IE. |
---|
31 | * |
---|
32 | * So the strategy is this, silly as it may be: Convert EVERYTHING to HTML |
---|
33 | * nodes, including the dijit.layout.SplitContainer by converting it to a |
---|
34 | * div with the dojoType. Then run it through the standard parser. |
---|
35 | * The more HTML you have relative to XML the less extra overhead this is. |
---|
36 | * |
---|
37 | * For something that is all XML we could have a different approach, |
---|
38 | * perhaps signified by a different type of script tag. In that case we |
---|
39 | * could just instantiate all the elements without a sourceNodeRef and then |
---|
40 | * add the top level components to the app. |
---|
41 | * |
---|
42 | * That is very straightforward but I haven't done it. |
---|
43 | * |
---|
44 | * Right now there is no mechanism to have an intermediary bridge between |
---|
45 | * the XML and the widget, because we are relying on dojo.parser |
---|
46 | * to do the instantiation. It isn't clear to me why we would want |
---|
47 | * those bridges in this approach and not in that approach. |
---|
48 | * |
---|
49 | */ |
---|
50 | |
---|
51 | xXml.widgetParser = new function(){ |
---|
52 | |
---|
53 | var d = dojo; |
---|
54 | |
---|
55 | this.parseNode = function(node){ |
---|
56 | |
---|
57 | var toBuild = []; |
---|
58 | //TODO figure out the proper type |
---|
59 | d.query("script[type='text/xml']", node).forEach(function(script){ |
---|
60 | toBuild.push.apply(toBuild, this._processScript(script)); |
---|
61 | }, this).orphan(); |
---|
62 | |
---|
63 | //instantiate everything at the end, doing it piecewise can give ID conflicts |
---|
64 | return d.parser.instantiate(toBuild); |
---|
65 | }; |
---|
66 | |
---|
67 | this._processScript = function(script){ |
---|
68 | //the text is either loaded from a separate file by the src |
---|
69 | //attribute or underneath the src tag |
---|
70 | var text = script.src ? d._getText(script.src) : script.innerHTML || script.firstChild.nodeValue; |
---|
71 | var htmlNode = this.toHTML( dojox.xml.parser.parse(text).firstChild ); |
---|
72 | |
---|
73 | //make the list BEFORE we copy things over to keep the query scope as |
---|
74 | //small as possible |
---|
75 | var ret = d.query('[dojoType]', htmlNode); |
---|
76 | //remove the script tag and replace with new HTML block |
---|
77 | query(">", htmlNode).place(script, "before") |
---|
78 | script.parentNode.removeChild(script); |
---|
79 | return ret; |
---|
80 | }; |
---|
81 | |
---|
82 | /** |
---|
83 | * Given an XML node converts it to HTML where the existing HTML |
---|
84 | * is preserved and the dojo widget tags are converted to divs |
---|
85 | * with dojoType on them. |
---|
86 | */ |
---|
87 | this.toHTML = function (/*XmlNode*/ node){ |
---|
88 | var newNode; |
---|
89 | var nodeName = node.nodeName; |
---|
90 | var dd = window.doc; |
---|
91 | var type = node.nodeType; |
---|
92 | |
---|
93 | |
---|
94 | ///node type 3 and 4 are text and cdata |
---|
95 | if(type >= 3){ |
---|
96 | return dd.createTextNode( (type == 3 || type == 4) ? node.nodeValue : "" ); |
---|
97 | } |
---|
98 | |
---|
99 | var localName = node.localName||nodeName.split(":").pop(); |
---|
100 | |
---|
101 | //TODO: |
---|
102 | // only check for namespace ONCE ever, instead of each time here, |
---|
103 | // by mixing in the right check for each browser? |
---|
104 | var namespace = node.namespaceURI || (node.getNamespaceUri ? node.getNamespaceUri() : ""); |
---|
105 | |
---|
106 | //TODO check for some real namespace |
---|
107 | if(namespace == "html"){ |
---|
108 | newNode = dd.createElement(localName); |
---|
109 | }else{ |
---|
110 | var dojoType = namespace + "." + localName; |
---|
111 | |
---|
112 | /** |
---|
113 | * This is a horrible hack we need because creating a <div> |
---|
114 | * with <option> children doesn't work well. Specifically with |
---|
115 | * dojo.Declaration at some point the <option> tags get lost |
---|
116 | * entirely so we need the parent of <option> tags to be <select> |
---|
117 | * tags. (Not a problem outside of dojo.Delcaration) |
---|
118 | * There are a couple other ways we could do this: |
---|
119 | * 1. Look at the first element child to see if it is an option and |
---|
120 | * if so create a <select> here. |
---|
121 | * 2. When we add a child to parent fix up the parent then if the |
---|
122 | * child is an <option> and the parent isn't a <select>. |
---|
123 | * Both of those are a bit messy and slower than this. |
---|
124 | * |
---|
125 | * This is potentially a problem for other tag combinations as well, |
---|
126 | * such as <tr> under a <table> or <li> under a <ul>/<ol>. |
---|
127 | * (dojox.widget.SortList for example). Probably need a robust strategy for |
---|
128 | * dealing with this. Worst case scenario for now is that user has to use |
---|
129 | * html tag with dojoType for misbehaving widget. |
---|
130 | */ |
---|
131 | newNode = newNode || dd.createElement((dojoType == "dijit.form.ComboBox") ? "select" : "div"); |
---|
132 | newNode.setAttribute("dojoType", dojoType); |
---|
133 | } |
---|
134 | |
---|
135 | // TODO: |
---|
136 | // we should probably set this up different, mixin a function |
---|
137 | // depending on if it is IE rather than checking every time here |
---|
138 | // the xmlns problem and the style problem are both IE specific |
---|
139 | d.forEach(node.attributes, function(attr){ |
---|
140 | // NOTE: IE always iterates *all* properties!!! |
---|
141 | var name = attr.name || attr.nodeName; |
---|
142 | var value = attr.value || attr.nodeValue; |
---|
143 | if(name.indexOf("xmlns") != 0){ |
---|
144 | // style=blah blah blah is a problem, in IE if you use |
---|
145 | // setAttribute here you get all sorts of problems. Maybe it |
---|
146 | // would be better to just create a giant string of HTML |
---|
147 | // instead of an object graph, then set innerHTML on something |
---|
148 | // to get the object graph? That might be cleaner... that way |
---|
149 | // is uses the browser HTML parsing exactly at is and won't |
---|
150 | // cause any sort of issues. We could just special case style |
---|
151 | // as well? |
---|
152 | if(has("ie") && name == "style"){ |
---|
153 | newNode.style.setAttribute("cssText", value); |
---|
154 | }else{ |
---|
155 | newNode.setAttribute(name, value); |
---|
156 | } |
---|
157 | } |
---|
158 | }); |
---|
159 | d.forEach(node.childNodes, function(cn){ |
---|
160 | var childNode = this.toHTML(cn); |
---|
161 | |
---|
162 | // script tags in IE don't like appendChild, innerHTML or innerText |
---|
163 | // so if we are creating one programatically set text instead |
---|
164 | // could special case this for IE only |
---|
165 | if(localName == "script"){ |
---|
166 | newNode.text += childNode.nodeValue; |
---|
167 | }else{ |
---|
168 | newNode.appendChild(childNode); |
---|
169 | } |
---|
170 | }, this); |
---|
171 | return newNode; |
---|
172 | }; |
---|
173 | |
---|
174 | }(); |
---|
175 | |
---|
176 | return dXml.widgetParser; |
---|
177 | |
---|
178 | }); |
---|